THE EDITORIAL WORKFLOW

Two reviewers with competence in the field are allocated for each submitted paper. In case of ambiguities, the paper is sent for reviewing to the third reviewer. The reviewer has access to the authors’ name. Finally, is arranged one meeting in order to select the final version of the entirely issue, and for each technical paper one reviewer has the responsibility to analyse all the suggestions and to reccomend for publication. The combining reviewing results have to be sent to the authors. Depending on case, the paper will support another review process, as it is mentioned above. Reviewers are not paid for the paper reviewing.

While the material contained in this journal is believed to be true and accurate, neither the authors, the editors nor the publishers can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that occur. The editors and publishers make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained in the ISEEE Journal.